Talk:Classic

About the brain game

Nitrome has revealed confirmed an unreleased game, based on there response to this comment. Should we create a page for the game, or merge it with another page? And if with another page, which one? --Talk to NOBODY   01:04, January 17, 2014 (UTC)

Personally, I think that we should create a new page, but then I realized that it would be best to just create a section on this page, and add a link to Template:Games, bringing them to the unreleased game section. Pufflesrcute (talk) 01:21, January 17, 2014 (UTC)

I'm fine with it having its own page also. I only broguht this up because RandomStoryKeeper voiced some concern over having it as its own article. --Talk to NOBODY   02:19, January 17, 2014 (UTC)

Nitrome wasn't particularly thrilled that their email was exposed on the comments without their prior knowledge. Even though they later rectified, saying that it was okay for NOBODY to post, these questionable sources might encourage habits such as asking Nitrome questions and then sounding desperate by adding that their answers could become "reliable" sources, when really, they're not.

If Nitrome created a blog post, or maybe mentioned this outside of comments, then a new article could be created. But the sources aren't notable enough, and the links don't lead to any comment, just the Pause Ahead blog post. There's also not a lot of content; the only reason the draft I'm reading is "long" now is because there are sections - but with only a couple sentences each. The article should not be longer than the length of the sources themselves, and if the only source is the comment, it shouldn't take up many bytes at all.

But I know this is not how you see it, so if you absolutely feel it is worth mentioning on the wiki, then it should, at most, be briefly mentioned on the Classic skin page. Completely delete the section of the character the corresponds to and replace it with the new text about it coming from a game. The initial text that's already on there has some wayward guesses, so they're not worth keeping on the page anyways.   Random-storykeeper 05:12, January 17, 2014 (UTC)